File	Doc	Category	Size	Date	Package
AbstractNumericTestCase.java	API Doc	Apache Poi 3.0.1	2696	Sun Mar 11 12:59:30 GMT 2007	org.apache.poi.hssf.record.formula.functions

AbstractNumericTestCase

• java.lang.Object
  • junit.framework.Assert
    • junit.framework.TestCase

Fields Summary
public static final double	POS_ZERO
public static final double	DIFF_TOLERANCE_FACTOR

Constructors Summary

Methods Summary
public static void	assertEquals(java.lang.String message, double baseval, double checkval, double almostZero, double diffToleranceFactor) Why doesnt JUnit have a method like this for doubles? The current impl (3.8.1) of Junit has a retar*** method for comparing doubles. DO NOT use that. TODO: This class should really be in an abstract super class to avoid code duplication across this project. param message param baseval param checkval double posZero = Math.abs(almostZero); double negZero = -1 * posZero; if (Double.isNaN(baseval)) { assertTrue(message+": Expected " + baseval + " but was " + checkval , Double.isNaN(baseval)); } else if (Double.isInfinite(baseval)) { assertTrue(message+": Expected " + baseval + " but was " + checkval , Double.isInfinite(baseval) && ((baseval<0) == (checkval<0))); } else { assertTrue(message+": Expected " + baseval + " but was " + checkval ,baseval != 0 ? Math.abs(baseval - checkval) <= Math.abs(diffToleranceFactor * baseval) : checkval < posZero && checkval > negZero); }
public static void	assertEquals(java.lang.String msg, double baseval, double checkval) assertEquals(msg, baseval, checkval, POS_ZERO, DIFF_TOLERANCE_FACTOR);
public void	setUp()
public void	tearDown()